National School Reform Faculty

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is a CFG?
How did the idea of Critical Friends Groups develop?
What are the purposes of a Critical Friends Group?
What are the characteristics of a professional learning community?
What is the difference between CFGs and PLCs?
I felt uncomfortable at those sessions critiquing or criticizing a colleague's work. I have a hard time with the word "critical."
What might those norms be?
What happens during a CFG session?
Why do CFG participants say that CFG work is more satisfying when compared to other kinds of professional development?
What happens in the Critical Friends Group Coaches Training?
What is a Critical Friends Group (CFG) Coach?
What is a National Facilitator?
Do I have to be trained as a CFG coach to participate in a CFG?
If the facilitator and/or participant is an administrator, doesn't that bias the discussion?
How large is a CFG?
What changes happen as a result of an individual's participation in a CFG?
Can you tell me more about the National School Reform Faculty?
Bibliography

What is a CFG?
A CFG is a professional learning community consisting of approximately 8-12 educators who come together voluntarily at least once a month for about 2 hours. Group members are committed to improving their practice through collaborative learning.

How did the idea of Critical Friends Groups develop?
In 1994, the Annenberg Institute for School Reform designed a different approach to professional development, one that would be focused on the practitioner and on defining what would improve student learning. Since the summer of 2000, Critical Friends Groups training is coordinated by the National School Reform Faculty (NSRF) at the Harmony Education Center in Bloomington, Indiana.

What are the purposes of a Critical Friends Group?
Critical Friends Groups are designed to

Create a professional learning community

Make teaching practice explicit and public by "talking about teaching"

Help people involved in schools to work collaboratively in democratic, reflective communities (Bambino)

Establish a foundation for sustained professional development based on a spirit of inquiry (Silva)

Provide a context to understand our work with students, our relationships with peers, and our thoughts, assumptions, and beliefs about teaching and learning

Help educators help each other turn theories into practice and standards into actual student learning

Improve teaching and learning

What are the characteristics of a professional learning community?
Professional learning communities are strong when teachers demonstrate:

Shared norms and values

Collaboration

Reflective dialogue

Deprivatization of practice

Collective focus on student learning

Spirit of shared responsibility for the learning of all students

Professional learning communities can develop when there is:

Time to meet and talk

Physical proximity

Interdependent teaching roles

Active communication structures

Teacher empowerment and autonomy

A professional learning community is enhanced when there is:

Openness to improvement

Trust and respect

A foundation in the knowledge and skills of teaching

Supportive leadership

Socialization or school structures that encourage the sharing of the school's vision and mission (Kruse, et al)

What is the difference between CFGs and PLCs?
There are a wide variety of professional learning communities (PLCs). Many PLCs are groups where teachers get together to:

Study state and national standards, the district curriculum guide, student achievement data, etc… and then agree upon outcomes that each student should achieve for every subject.

Develop assessments to monitor each student’s mastery of the outcomes.

Analyze student performance based on these assessments.

Discuss new strategies to implement to raise student achievement.

So, the work is very focused—all very much driven by standardized test scores. Teachers meet in PLCs to make sure the kids do well on the agreed upon assessments and if they don’t, require the students to put more time into learning what they didn’t get the first time around.

How are teachers supposed to help students do better on the next round of assessments? Most PLC trainings suggest that teachers develop norms or protocols to clarify expectations regarding roles, responsibilities, and relationships among the team members, but do not give you those “norms or protocols.”

During NSRF New Coaches Critical Friends Groups training, we actually give you the tools that you need to collaborate with your colleagues in your CFGs to improve student outcomes. We also teach you how to improve your faculty meetings, classroom practices, parent conferences, cabinet meetings, strategic planning sessions, inquiry groups, and study groups. So, participating in a CFG is not “one more thing on your plate.” It is the tool you use to get “the things on your plate” accomplished in an efficient and effective manner.

I felt uncomfortable at those sessions critiquing or criticizing a colleague's work. I have a hard time with the word “critical.”
That is a common misconception about NSRF founders' use of the word “critical.” In CFG context, critical means “important,” “key,” “essential,” or “urgent,” such as in “critical care.” Furthermore, when a group of educators develop a CFG, they begin by spending time discussing and developing norms about how to give feedback and how to question in a sensitive manner so that everyone feels comfortable. Trust and confidentiality are established among participants.

What might those norms be?
That depends on what the group decides. The norms might range from being on time, to watching air time, to confidentiality, to being prepared, or to challenging the thinking of group members.

What happens during a CFG session?
Lots of different activities may occur in the ongoing sessions, each of approximately 2 hours.

The coach typically may facilitate one of several time-managed protocols (strategies or formal structures) for examining student work, brought to the group by one of its members.

The coach may facilitate a protocol for examining teacher work, brought to the group by one of its members.

Group members will support each other and improve their teaching by giving and receiving feedback, by questioning each other and themselves, by reflecting on their work or their students' work, by addressing dilemmas, by collaborating across disciplines, by confronting assumptions, mindsets, and expectations, but never by blaming students or social conditions.

Members might maintain a reflective journal on a given prompt or around the more generic, “What am I thinking about now? What do I plan to do about it?” (Bisplinghoff, et al)

The coach may begin the session with, “So, what did we try or reconsider since the last meeting?” (Bisplinghoff, et al)

Group members might request a peer observer to help them improve a specific aspect of their teaching.

The coach might facilitate a text-based discussion of a topic of concern or interest to the group.

Why do CFG participants say that CFG work is more satisfying when compared to other kinds of professional development?

It is continual.

It is focused on their own teaching and their own students' learning.

It takes place in a small group of supportive and trusted colleagues within their own school.

The use of protocols and activities promote efficient and effective meetings.

Participants have control over their own professional learning needs.

What happens in the Critical Friends Group Coaches Training?
The purpose of the training is to train/prepare coaches to coordinate honest and productive conversations with colleagues focused on improving student learning and improving teacher practices.
Some of the skills the coaches practiced were:

Setting norms for working together

Active listening

Understanding guidelines for dialogue

Understanding the dynamics of offering and receiving warm (supportive) or cool feedback

Formulating clarifying and probing questions

Using protocols for examining student and teacher work, for solving problems, setting goals, observing peers, and building teams

What is a Critical Friends Group (CFG) Coach?
A CFG coach is someone who has gone through a 5-day New Coaches CFG seminar. CFG coaches are qualified to run Critical Friends Groups (CFGs) in their schools, as well as use NSRF protocols in their classrooms, staff meetings, department meetings, etc… CFG coaches are not qualified to train other people to be CFG coaches. That’s the job of NSRF’s National Facilitators.

What is a National Facilitator?
National Facilitators are CFG coaches who go through additional training so that they are qualified to facilitate 5-day CFG New Coaches Trainings, as well as other workshops, strategic planning sessions and school visits associated with NSRF. This additional training includes coaching a CFG for a year and interning with a mentor National Facilitator.

Do I have to be trained as a CFG coach to participate in a CFG?
Absolutely not! To participate in a CFG you need to

Be committed to improving your practice,

agree to meet regularly,

understand your responsibility for contributing to each member's learning, and

adhere to the norms established by the individual CFG group.

If the facilitator and/or participant is an administrator, doesn't that bias the discussion?
No, but the administrators are sensitive to that perception. A CFG is composed of equal members where there is no "hierarchy of expertise" and it must be a democratic, reflective and collaborative community of learners.

How large is a CFG?
A group of 8 - 12 is an ideal size. The composition of a group is ultimately up to those interested in starting a CFG.

What changes happen as a result of an individual's participation in a CFG?
Quoting Jon Appleby, a CFG coach in Maine, “I have been fortunate to experience what the support and push of a CFG can mean, and how powerful and accelerated our learning can be if we allow ourselves to both lead and follow, to question and to be questioned, as equals with thoughtful peers. I have also discovered, personally, that my energy and wellness as a teacher depend upon the revitalization that occurs when I share, among friends, in critical reflection and when I am, therefore, learning myself.”

Research indicates that classrooms move from being teacher-centered toward student-centered. Furthermore, teachers are more thoughtful about connecting curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Teachers in CFG's believe that they can affect student achievement and these teachers have higher expectations for student learning, which, in turn, leads to greater student achievement.

Can you tell me more about the National School Reform Faculty?
NSRF promotes the values of reflective practice, collaboration, shared leadership, authentic pedagogy, democracy, equity in opportunity and achievement, and social justice to form the basis of a national movement that will result in improved teacher quality and improved learning for all students. (Dunne).
More information is available throughout this website.

Bibliography
“Critical Friends Groups: Teachers Helping Teachers to Improve Student Learning” Faith Dunne, Bill Nave, Anne Lewis, Phi Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, Development, and Research Research Bulletin, No. 28, December 2000.

“Reflections of an NSRF Coach,” Jon Appleby, June 1998

“Building Professional Community in Schools,” Sharon Kruse, Karen Seashore Lewis, Anthony Bryk

Issues in Restructuring Schools, Report from Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools Spring 1994

“Critical Friends,” Deborah Bambino, Educational Leadership March 2002 pp. 25-27.

“What if…” Peggy Silva, Connections: Journal of NSRF, Spring 2002 pp. 6, 14

“Documenting Decisions: Making Learning Explicit in our CFG,” Betty Shockley Bisplinghoff, et al

Connections: Journal of NSRF, Fall 2002 pp. 4, 15-18

Modified from a document prepared by Marie McKenzie and Anne Marie Carr-Reardon
June 2003--