CFG
Evaluation
The NSRF program has grown from an initial cohort of eighty Critical
Friends Groups in sixty schools in 1995 to more than 1000 CFGs in
nine hundred schools in 2002. To provide concrete information about
how, and how well, CFGs are working, the Annenberg Institute for School
Reform commissioned a two year study of CFGs that was started during
the 1997-98 school year to determine their effectivness in meeting
interim and long-term objectives.
The institute conducted a theory-based evaluation, which assumes that
every program is based on a theory about how and why it will work.
The theory about how and why CFGs will work is that teachers or activities,
seek each others advice about professional issues and problems, and
count on most staff members to help out anywhere, anytime; became
more thoughtful about the connections among curriculum, assessment,
and pedagogy as they participated in the CFG activities; have higher
expectations for students than do teachers who do not participate;
effectively challenge traditional norms and definitions
of time, privacy, and adult learning.
You can read the results of this study published by Phi Delta Kappa
in their December 2000 Research Bulletin at http://www.pdkintl.org/edres/resbul28.htm.