| |
Connections
the
Journal of the National School Reform Faculty
Spring
2010
Interview with Participants from the “Building Collaborative
Learning Communities” Leadership Seminar in Bloomington,
Indiana, Nov. 2009 and March 2010
By Michele
Mattoon
The National School Reform Faculty’s
National Center, just completed a Leadership Seminar in Bloomington,
Indiana. This training focused on teaching participants how
to increase student achievement through collaborative learning
communities. By the end of the training, participants learned
to improve student learning, create equity in the classroom,
increase efficient, effective communication and enhance personal
performance through the use of protocols and reflective practice.
The seminar was led by Dave Lehman, the Interim Director of
NSRF and Michele Mattoon, the Training Coordinator for NSRF.
This was an open training, so educators came from such places
as California, Texas, Florida and Alabama to attend, as well
as some teachers from Harmony School in Bloomington.
This particular seminar was unique. One of our themes was “Democracy
in Schools” and we were privileged to have Debbie Meier,
a well-known educational reformer, writer and activist, as an
integral part of the seminar. She gave an inspiring keynote
speech the first day, and, using NSRF protocols that are used
for in-depth text-based discussions, we discussed several of
her writings, particularly related democracy in the school setting,
with Debbie present and participating in the conversation, entering
at various points throughout each protocol as the Participants
discussed each writing. The following are responses from two
of the participants, reflecting particularly on this unique
involvement of an author in having text-based discussions.
NSRF - Please tell us your name, where you’re
from and what you do.
Phu Tranchi - Principal of General Studies at Shalhevet School
in Los Angeles; I also teach science.
Kaethe Perez – University of Florida,
Lastinger Center for Learning Facilitator, working mainly in
the Pinellas County School District, in Largo Florida; I also
work with a UF Professor in Residence to support the school
district as they develop and deepen an understanding of active,
engaged instruction, teacher inquiry, effective professional
learning communities, and how those elements foster improved
teacher learning and teacher practice.
NSRF - Was this seminar a worthwhile experience?
In what ways?
Phu - The NSRF Seminar was
a tremendous experience for several reasons. First of all, having
Debbie Meier present was incredible. She is such a massive figure
in education and to have her join us in a small group setting
was a true privilege. I am very excited about what I learned
and look forward to implementing Critical Friends in my school.
I have no doubt that it will have a profound impact on our education.
The faculty who I have started to train are very positive about
the nature of the collaboration and eager anticipate learning
more. I really enjoyed the practical approach of the seminar,
where we were forming a CFG among the participants without even
realizing it. The way that we went through the protocols effectively
modeled how relationships can be developed among educators in
a school, while giving the participants the confidence to facilitate
at our own schools. Finally, I thought that we had a very special
group of educators in attendance and I felt honored to spend
the time together, learning from and inspiring each other.
Kaethe - I appreciated the seminar format of
three days, followed by a few months break, followed by a two
day follow-up. This stretched-out format gave me time to ‘settle
in’ to the philosophy, try out various protocols, and
integrate the work into my current program. Fortunately, I have
the support of UF Lastinger faculty and facilitators who have
had this NSRF experience, either first hand in a five day seminar,
or in co-facilitating with NSRF facilitators and coaches in
the UF network.
Coming to the seminar helped me understand the underlying philosophy
of NSRF, that a quest for equity and democracy drives this work.
Giving voice to and empowering teachers and leaders to study
their practice systematically and within conversational structures
provides leverage, which assists development of collegial relationships.
This in turn strengthens the professional practice of teaching
and learning in classrooms, team meetings, school staffs and
districts. In a prior educational role, I became certified as
a trainer in another program that uses strategies to build resiliency,
long term relationships, and community. While the protocol aspect
of the NSRF seminar has some similarities, I can now better
appreciate that the mission and message of NSRF is one of equity
and democracy.
NSRF - How was it having Deborah Meier in the
seminar as a keynote speaker, an author of texts that were discussed,
and a participant?
Phu - As mentioned above, it was an absolute
thrill to just have her present, never mind participating with
us throughout the sessions. She is so prolific and still providing
us with novel insights to democratic education. The fact that
we could discuss her texts with her present to clarify and expand
upon her work was such a unique opportunity. Her sense of humor
around what she was thinking when she wrote some the pieces
was relieving because we tend to be so serious about what we
are doing all the time. She reminded us that it is just as important
to enjoy leisure and to have fun with what we do. Again, it
was such a great privilege.
Kaethe - Deb’s experiences and passion
for her life’s work in education was the exclamation point
on the seminar!! Having the author of many of the texts used
in the text-based protocols gave additional depth to our conversations.
She is not the least bit shy in challenging the status quo in
small group discussions which pushed me to deepen my thinking
about equity within and outside the educational system.
Deb’s life wisdom is inspirational, as is her zealous
return time and time again to equity and democracy, the underpinning
philosophy of NSRF. In one of our small group conversations,
I had an ‘AHA’ moment when Deb emphasized that NSRF
is not about protocols, that the protocols are a vehicle that
can empower equity and democracy of voice, whether administrator,
teacher or student.
NSRF - Were you able to use what you learned
back at your school? Would you like to share any successes or
roadblocks?
Phu - I have started to implement some of the
CFG protocols successfully with two specific groups so far.
My primary focus is on training our Educational Leadership Team,
composed of department chairs and other administrators involved
in our educational program. We have established an environment
of safety within critique and learned a lot more about each
other in the process. We recently completed our first consultancy
protocol, which spawned one of the most profound conversations
I’ve ever had about education in the ten years I’ve
been at this school. I’m trying to be patient about getting
this out to the faculty as a whole, though I’ve used some
of the meeting protocols with them. I also trained some student
leaders to facilitate sessions with students and teachers using
some of the protocols, which was amazing to watch. I envision
different CFGs being used throughout the school and at all levels
eventually.
Kaethe - Successes: In Pinellas County Schools,
we provided job-embedded professional development with 19 elementary
schools, facilitated school leadership institutes, coaching
academies, principal institutes, and are now partnering with
the district to redesign professional development. Since the
NSRF seminars I stepped up to the plate, offering to build the
original agenda for a follow-up combined regional principal
meeting, thinking both about the content objectives as well
as the most appropriate protocols to bring an equity of voice
to the work. The original agenda then became a ‘weather-vane’,
so to speak, when emailed locally to our colleagues in Gainesville
and Miami for their well-respected input. After a few iterations,
the facilitator group met face-to-face to finalize and strategically
think through the agenda, keeping in mind the original objectives,
the participants, and the flow of the day.
Challenges: In this principal meeting, I had included a well-received
protocol demonstrated at the NSRF two day follow-up (Penny for
your Thoughts), as well as a protocol from the NSRF website
newsletter. Dave Lehman has written a Two-minute Consultancy
which we used to gather feedback about the district PD redesign
from this group of 80+ principals. I realized halfway through
the protocol that table groups of five or six could sustain
the silence and give good written feedback. The larger table
groups of 8-10 were losing energy fast – so I gave a moment
of ‘energy release’, and encouraged groups to keep
passing their question page around. Implication for future work?
The size of the group and the purpose of the task need careful
consideration!
NSRF - What is one thing that has stuck with
you about this seminar?
Phu - Wow, it’s hard to delineate the
one thing that stuck with me because there were so many great
things. I guess what continues to resonate with me is how dramatically
you can improve school culture through the CFG approach. It
makes so much sense, but unfortunately remains very counter-intuitive
in schools. Education must continue to evolve and I hope that
CFGs will be a part our development.
Kaethe - Dave and Michele were excellent models
of facilitation. Most important was the transparency of facilitation
moves that both of them drew to our attention. I appreciate
so much more the power of co-facilitation – the dance
– which strengthens the work to be accomplished. Lots
of pre-planning, time to review and revise the original agenda,
debriefing at the end of each day to prepare the best agenda
for tomorrow – all these things were modeled with patience
and poise. This seminar helped me realize my role as an NSRF
coach is to be the frame/support for the participants to actualize
their empowerment towards improved professional practice. When
I can provide the most well-thought out agenda and protocol(s)
for a particular group, the group itself grows and deepens in
their practice.
NSRF - Any other comments?
Phu - As we look to continue to reform education
to benefit our students, it is important to develop strategies
for benefiting teachers. It is very clear that there is no better
way to improve schools than to ensure that teachers have the
opportunity to learn and develop ourselves. From my brief experience
with CFG strategies, I can vouch for the efficacy of this approach
to developing professional learning communities. I’ve
not seen educators so genuinely excited about the prospect of
professional development. The intent of the approach comes across
and disarms teachers when they can see that it is so clearly
directed at their benefit and consequently their students. I’ve
enjoyed a very memorable experience that will remain with me.
I hope to always promote and be involved in a Critical Friends
Group for the rest of my career.

Kaethe - I am so fortunate to have a local
support system which includes Don Pemberton, director of the
UF Lastinger Center and Sylvia Boynton, my colleague in Pinellas
County. It was Sylvia who recommended I attend this seminar,
which she had attended a few years ago in Tampa. I am grateful
to be working with two Florida NSRF Facilitators, Pete Bermudez
and Magdi Castaneda, who are UF Lastinger faculty members. Bottom
line: you can read the website, you can attend meetings and
workshops where these protocols are used, but to experience
the full seminar with the focus on equity and democracy –
this has helped me refine my own practice. Thank you.
Back to Top
|